| | |

Has the Bribery Act had an Impact?

Andrew MaclayThe Bribery Act (The Act) eventually came into force on 1 July 2011, following intensive lobbying by corporate and international lawyers who felt the original draft legislation was unclear and feared it would unfairly prejudice UK companies against others operating in the international marketplace.  So, 12 months on, what has been its impact?

Well, there has been one prosecution so far – this was the conviction of Munir Patel, a 22 year old administration clerk at Redbridge magistrates court who received a three year prison sentence for earning £20,000 for helping UK drivers avoid penalty points.  This seemed to be quite a severe sentence, but he had allegedly repeated the offence fifty times.

However, there have been no prosecutions or even publicly announced investigations of large corporates operating overseas, which were the ones really expected to be targeted by the Act.  So, does this mean that the Act has had no impact and can safely be ignored?  BDO doesn’t think so, for the following reasons. 

  • SFO investigations into bribery take time, and there are rumours to suggest that the SFO has begun a number of investigations with a team of up to 50 staff working on corruption investigations
  • A lot of large companies have taken the opportunity to review their anti-bribery and other similar procedures and have implemented the 6 Adequate Procedures (Proportionate procedures, Top level commitment, Risk assessment, Due diligence, Communication & training and Monitoring &review)
  • Companies have tightened up their rules on corporate hospitality by defining more clearly what is allowed and what is not and setting explicit monetary limits.  Anecdotally, this may have reduced demand for corporate hospitality at major English summer events and for tickets to the London 2012 Olympics
  • A small number of companies may have decided they can no longer operate in certain countries with examples cited in Africa and India.  This is unfortunate, as it has meant less international trade for those companies.

The most challenging issue remains on facilitation payment (small payments for getting through a police checkpoint or getting your goods released by customs etc).  What are companies meant to do about these?  The Act says they are illegal, and yet the SFO says it will not prosecute isolated instances.  BDO’s recommendation is to follow SFO and Transparency International guidance -  train staff who are at the cutting edge of having to pay facilitation payments, and do everything possible to avoid paying them, but if this does not work, consider whether you are prepared to pay or not, and if you do pay, record it clearly and openly in your accounts.

To review your client’s anti-bribery processes and procedures, please click here to access BDO’s Anti-Bribery and Corruption diagnostic tool or speak to Andrew Maclay on 0207 893 3487.

JUNE 2012

 

Comment on this article

Would you like to rate the article?

Contacts

Andrew Maclay

Director
Telephone: 020 7893 3487 Email Andrew

FOLLOW US ONLINE

Follow us on Twitter. Click on the links below for the latest BDO updates:

@BDOaccountant

Accountants and Business Advisers © 2013 BDO LLP. All rights reserved. BDO LLP, a UK limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC305127, is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms. A list of members' names is open to inspection at our registered office, 55 Baker Street, London W1U 7EU. BDO LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority to conduct investment business. BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms.